![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:26 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Why has no one thought of this one yet?
Because damn truck interiors can be luxurious.
I count SUVs as trucks, so that's why the Escalade, Navigator, and Yukon are included.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:28 |
|
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:30 |
|
What Mercedes SUV other than the G65 has a V12? This definitely isn't an SUV.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:31 |
|
Considering the trucks listed are sold at 50-66% less than the car that you hold up as luxury...
Truxury it is.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:32 |
|
Wrong Ram
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:32 |
|
Me gusta Escalade.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:32 |
|
I'm gonna be brutally honest here...
The new Impala's interior looks more luxurious than that. That wood is appalling.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:33 |
|
I don't believe in Truxury.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:34 |
|
The Impala is an abomination. :I
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:34 |
|
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:35 |
|
If I could only get one without this crap.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:38 |
|
Replaced with Lonhorn. If I could find a picture of a 1500 Limited and not a 2500...
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:39 |
|
I'd much rather have one of these that costs a fraction and lasts 400k+ miles:
Than this, that breaks severely ever 100k:
The truck is way more practical as well.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:40 |
|
That's what the first is.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:40 |
|
No. Compared to that orange and tan monstrosity it looks downright appealing.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:41 |
|
I know, but that isn't exactly a great picture.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:41 |
|
Yup.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:46 |
|
The materials in the S-Class are a hell of a lot better than in the Impala.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:47 |
|
No shit Sherlock. They better be for it being over $100k. The Impala's interior design looks so much better though. And the wood isn't almost fucking ORANGE .
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:55 |
|
LOL @ the Lincoln. The F-150 has a nicer interior.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:56 |
|
If we're counting SUVs as trucks, that opens up a whole new realm, albeit not body on frame:
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:57 |
|
It is pretty bad, but still decent considering it's basically a refresh of something that's like 10 years old.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:58 |
|
I was mostly thinking body-on-frame. Truck-based.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:59 |
|
Fine, be that way.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 17:59 |
|
An old Range Rover would count tho. They were BOF up until this generation, no?
![]() 12/17/2014 at 18:02 |
|
Correct.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 18:13 |
|
That's damn truxurious.
![]() 12/17/2014 at 20:16 |
|
You forgot one.
![]() 12/18/2014 at 00:10 |
|
I never noticed this before, but, why is it that only GM and toyota have a recess in their center console/ armrest thing? My family is very GM so, we have always had that. I guess I just assumed that all big vehicles have it.